E 'of these days the news that the Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to former Vice President Al Gore for his commitment to the environment. There are now many years that people talk and strap ecology, since the time of the Club of Rome , though at the time someone said that the glaciers were advancing! The whole point of the question is what affects the amount of CO2 emissions on global warming. The same data are primarily derived from measurements of the overheating that are underway by the mid-nineteenth century, usually in urban areas, which are those where - of course - is experiencing the highest increase in heat: heating, cooling and traffic. The relationship between CO2 emissions and global warming is supported by many experts and challenged by others who argue the influence of temperature variation of the Sun That said, it is clear to everyone as we take care of our planet, how it is important to assess the impact of economic development on the environment. What - always - I find intolerable is the destructive approach of ecologists who are willing to stop any work in the public interest in the name of their ideological vision of society. We need to live and work in buildings, roads, public transport, there is no development without pollution. In recent years, Verdi (which I still think Rossi be in) are covered with the fig leaf of "sustainable development". Only knows what this means to them, talk with sources of vagueness energy sources, mentioning experiments abroad, but never lead data in regard to which it would be possible to abandon fossil fuels and replace them - for example - with the wind sources. It 'clear to me that these data are not presented since they are clear that this replacement is not feasible. As for the actual behavior of the Greens, just to see how during the legilslatura have blocked any public work.
Also in recent days has given the European Community , stating that ' Nuclear Energy is the only possible solution for sustainable development and for the environment! Congratulations, we have lost thirty years, during which we pututo invest in nuclear power plants and reduce pollution! This is all a great shame for the Greens, which has always - illogically - are opposed to nuclear energy. I still remember when feared millennial disaster, produced the usual Hollywood anti-Western nonsense as " China Syndrome", while in Italy, with the infamous pact between right and left, closing the nuclear program and opening up the pipeline with Libya (then the financing of terrorism, do you remember Lockerbie ?) and the ' USSR at that time had at least two hundred warheads nuclear bets on Italian cities! The wickedness of those decisions is immeasurable, and I think that they can assume the crime of high treason.
The only funny thing is the Nobel Prize to Al Gore: I want to know how many houses have, however, how many square feet, how many cars, if any helicopters, planes, and more. Who intends to vigorously fight pollution, should set an example, before you make a film that - among others - has been criticized by many experts as being too alarmist. A final issue concerns the Kyoto Protocol which rightly has not been ratified by President Bush : it is never possible that any green initiatives should always and only to the detriment of the economy of the West? why not take action that accountability even as the Nations' India and China who are perpetrating serious havoc for years? The real point is made that speak of ecology and peace is always useful to collect easy consensus in the media and distracted population, but the practical management of these problems is extremely complex and can not be left to anti-capitalist and anti-Western demagogues.
0 comments:
Post a Comment